Request a Proposal

    U.S. Department of Energy Hanford Nuclear Site

    Scope 3 Mobile Source Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction

    Following President Obama’s Executive Order 13514, Brightworks audited the Hanford Nuclear Site’s mobile source Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions and developed a plan to reduce those emissions while reducing costs to Hanford and its employees.

    • Building types

    About the Hanford Nuclear Reservation

    This section adapted from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanford_Site

    At the height of World War II, as part of the Manhattan Project, the United States government built the world’s first full-scale plutonium reactor on the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in southeast Washington.  The Hanford site produced the plutonium used in the first atomic bomb ever detonated, at a test site in New Mexico, and in the second, the Fat Man plutonium bomb detonated over Nagasaki, Japan, in 1945.

    During the Cold War from 1945 until 1991, the Federal government expanded the Hanford site to accommodate nine nuclear reactors and five large plutonium processing plants, which provided the weapons grade plutonium fuel for most of the 60,000 nuclear weapons in the US nuclear arsenal.  In 1964, following President John F. Kennedy’s signing of the first Nuclear Test Ban Treaty, the Federal government began to decommission Hanford’s weapons production reactors.  These reactors were fully decommissioned at the end of the Cold War.

    The decades of plutonium production on the Hanford site have left it the most contaminated nuclear site in the United States.  Two-thirds of the country’s high-level radioactive waste is housed at Hanford.  The nation’s largest environmental clean-up, currently underway at Hanford, focuses on remediating:

    • 53 million gallons of high-level radioactive waste
    • 25 million cubic feet of solid radioactive waste
    • 200 square miles of contaminated groundwater beneath the site
    • Additional contamination in undocumented sites

    EO 13514: Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance

    In 2009, eight months after taking office, President Barack Obama signed Executive Order 13514, formally titled, “Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance,” with the intent for the Federal government to lead by example in sustainability and to stimulate business innovation in sustainable products and services.  This order directed Federal agencies (including the Department of Energy, which has overseen the Hanford site since 1977) to develop the most concrete plans ever for reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.  The executive order identifies the following goals for the operation of Federal agencies under the Obama administration:

    • establish an integrated strategy towards sustainability in the Federal government
    • make reduction of greenhouse gas emissions a priority for Federal agencies
    • create a clean energy economy
    • prioritize actions based on a full accounting of both economic and social benefits

    Supporting these goals, the executive order also gave Federal agencies the most concrete targets ever (see below), along with the senior-most White House oversight of any executive branch sustainability program.  In accordance with the Executive Order, executive branch agencies were required to file annual Strategic Sustainability Performance Plans (SSPPs) with the Office of the Federal Environmental Executive, the Director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, and the Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality.

    Development of the Hanford greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy

    As part of the Hanford site’s efforts to comply with the president’s executive order, the Department of Energy retained Vista Engineering Technologies and Brightworks Sustainability to develop a strategy for reducing Scope 3 mobile source emissions.

    Brightworks audited data on employee commuting patterns between the Tri-Cities and the Hanford Site and quantified the associated emissions.  The audit found that the clean-up effort produces a total of 161,663 metric tons of greenhouse gas per year.  Commuter travel accounted for 83% of Hanford’s scope III emissions, second in greenhouse gas emissions only to energy used on the site: 32,604 tons result from employee use of single occupancy vehicles for commuting to and from work.

    After quantifying Hanford’s scope III mobile source emissions, Brightworks generated a list of possible reduction strategies that were then evaluated against security, feasibility, and logistical requirements, resulting in a short list of 16 options.  These were then ranked on four scales:

    • Greenhouse gas reduction potential
    • Cost effectiveness
    • Duration of implementation
    • Employee preference

    After studying alternatives, Brightworks recommended a reduction strategy that combines the five most effective strategies for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, which together reduce Hanford’s scope 3 emissions by 53.7%.  The strategy includes:

    • Relocating 2,070 employees, whose job functions do not require frequent access to the nuclear reservation, from the Hanford site to downtown Richland, WA. This eliminated 7,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, or 21.5% of Hanford’s scope III emissions.  Those employees eligible for relocation perform job functions that do not require frequent access to the nuclear reservation.
    • Increasing vanpool usage from 17% to 25% of Hanford employees, eliminating 6,817 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, or 20.8% of Hanford’s scope III emissions.
    • Two-day-per-week teleworking for non-union employees equipped with secure network connections and required hardware and software platforms, eliminating 2,267 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, or 7% of Hanford’s scope III emissions.
    • Increasing carpools of at least two employees per vehicle, eliminating 800 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, or 2.5% of Hanford’s scope III emissions.
    • Buspooling for work groups in vehicles provided by the regional public transit provider, eliminating 617 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents, or 1.9% of Hanford’s scope III emissions.

    Goals for Federal Agencies Specified in EO 13514

    EO 13514 directed Federal agencies to achieve the following targets:

    • Reduce petroleum consumption by 2% per year through FY2020 (applies to agencies with fleets of more than 20 vehicles) over a FY2005 baseline.
    • Reduce potable water intensity by 2% annually for a total reduction of 26% by FY2020 over a FY2007 baseline.
    • Reduce industrial, landscaping, and agricultural water intensity by 2% annually for a total reduction of 20% by FY2020 over a FY2010 baseline.
    • Achieve 50% or higher diversion rate of non-hazardous solid waste by FY2015.
    • Achieve 50% or higher diversion rate of construction and demolition materials and debris by FY2015.
    • Ensure at least 15% of existing buildings and leases of over 5,000 square feet meet the Guiding Principles for Federal Leadership in High Performance and Sustainable Buildings FY2015.
    • Ensure 95% of all new contracts, including non-exempt contract modifications, require products and services that are energy-efficient, water-efficient, bio-based, environmentally preferable, non-ozone depleting, contain recycled-content, non-toxic or less-toxic alternatives.

    EO 13514 directed executive branch agencies to meet the following goals:

    • Increase renewable energy and renewable energy generation on agency property.
    • Pursue opportunities with vendors and contractors to reduce GHG emissions (i.e., transportation options and supply chain activities).
    • Reduce building energy intensity.
    • Ensure all new Federal buildings that enter the planning process in 2020 and thereafter are designed to achieve zero-net-energy standards by 2030.
    • Use low GHG emitting vehicles, including AFVs, and optimize the number of vehicles in agency fleets.
    • Implement water management strategies including water-efficient and low-flow fixtures.
    • Implement source reduction to minimize waste and pollutant generation.
    • Decrease use of chemicals directly associated with GHG emissions.
    • Participate in transportation planning and recognize existing infrastructure in regions/communities.
    • Ensure procurement preference for EPEAT-registered electronic products.

    EO 13514 directed agencies to pursue the following general goals in their operations:

    • Develop and implement innovative, agency-specific policies and practices to reduce scope 3 GHG emissions in agency operations.
    • Manage existing buildings to reduce energy, water, and materials consumption.
    • Implement and achieve objectives in EPA’s Stormwater Management Guidance (§14).
    • Reduce paper use and acquire paper containing at least 30% postconsumer fiber.
    • Minimize the acquisition, use, and disposal of toxic and hazardous materials.
    • Employ environmentally sound practices for the disposition of all agency excess or surplus electronic products.
    • Procure Energy Star and FEMP-designated electronic equipment.
    • Continue implementation of existing EMS programs.

    At a Glance

    • Richland, WA